|
|
|
@ -25,4 +25,18 @@ to a correct translation (from the original proposal and the automatic translati |
|
|
|
2 * Beware of punctuation |
|
|
|
------------------------- |
|
|
|
The internet browsers read texts correctly in the language chosen for the |
|
|
|
computer operating system, but the quality of autoplay depends on punctuation. |
|
|
|
computer operating system, but the quality of autoplay depends on punctuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 * Pedagogy |
|
|
|
------------- |
|
|
|
* Do not think "course at level 3", but think "pedagogical path on levels 1 to 4".<br> |
|
|
|
You do not work at level 3, recalling (too) quickly the useful background |
|
|
|
(essential but often poorly mastered by students) required to understand your course. |
|
|
|
Your course must be designed with the 4 levels in mind. Structure the difficulties |
|
|
|
and prerequisites of your teaching in levels, and work in parallel on |
|
|
|
the 4 levels. Structure in levels means, for each level N: <br> |
|
|
|
\- what is the added value of that level N, which provides new concepts and mathematical |
|
|
|
toolsn that open new horizons in the thematic?<br> |
|
|
|
\- which vision and basic notions must remain at lower levels of complexity and |
|
|
|
mastering? |
|
|
|
\- what should I reserve for the upper level(s)? |
