You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
12 KiB
12 KiB
| title | published | vissible | media_order |
|---|---|---|---|
| lensball : beyond | true | true | lentille-boule-orleans-1bis.jpg,lensball-brut-820-760.jpg,Einstein-ring-free.jpg |
! YOUR CHALLENGE : Looking at a cathedral through a lensball. Can you predict your observation?
!
!
!
! Discovery time : 2 hours
! Resolution time : 30 minutes
!
!
! you need to check the equations if you have not previously memorised them and to perfom ! the calculation, are important. ! !
!
! I choose it !
! A lensball is a polished spherical ball of radius $R=5 cm$, made of glass of refractive
! index value $n_{glass}=1.5$. The cathedral is 90 meters high, and you stand with the lensball
! 400 meters from the cathedral. You look at the cathedral through the lens, your eye being at 20 cm
! from the center of the lens. What would you expect to see?
!
! * The resolution time is the typical expected time to be allocated to this problem if it was part
! of an examen for an optics certificate.
!
! * The discovery time is the expected time you require to prepare this challenge if you don't
! have practice. However, this is just an indication, take as much time as you need. The time to
! question yourself serenely about how to handle the problem, about the method of resolution and
! its validity, about some possible approximations if they can be justified, and the time! you need to check the equations if you have not previously memorised them and to perfom ! the calculation, are important. ! !
!
! ! Ready to answer M3P2 team questions ? !
! !
!
!
!! What is the scientifical framework you choose to study this problem ? !
! * All the characteristic sizes in this problem are much bigger than the wavelength of ! the visible radiation ($\lambda\approx5\mu m$), so I deal with this problem in the framework
! of geometrical optics, and in the paraxial approximation in order to characterize the image.
!
! * The cathedral sustains an angle of $arctan\dfrac{90}{400}=13°$ from the lensball.
! This value seems reasonable to justify at first order the use of the paraxial approximation
! (we usually consider that angles of incidence would not exceed 10° on the various simple
! optical element encountered between the objet (here the cathedral) and the final image
! (retina of the eye or matrix sensor of a camera).
!
!
!
!! Describe the optical system for this use of the lensball. !
! * The lensball breaks down into two refracting spherical surfaces sharing the same ! centre of curvature C and of opposite radius (in algebraic values). !
!
! $
! $
!
!! What is your method of resolution ? !
! * You don't use general equations 3a and 3b for a thick lens, they are too complicated to remind, ! and you don't have in m3p2 to "use" but to "build a reasoning". And you don't know at this ! step how to handle with centered optical systems. ! ! * But this system is simple, so you will calculate the image of the cathedral by the ! first spherical refracting surface $DS_1$ encountered by the light from the cathedral
! $DS_1$. Then this image becomes the object for the second spherical refracting surface
! $DS_2$ and so I can determine position and size of the final image.
!
! * For a spherical refracting surface, general equations are :! $
\dfrac{n_{fin}}{\overline{SA_{ima}}}-\dfrac{n_{ini}}{\overline{SA_{obj}}}=\dfrac{n_{fin}-n_{ini}}{\overline{SC}}$
! for the position.! $
\overline{M_T}=\dfrac{n_{ini}\cdot\overline{SA_{ima}}}{n_{fin}\cdot\overline{SA_{obj}}}$
! for the transverse magnification.
!
!
! Second spherical refrating surface $
! Distance between $
! Object cathedral $
! Let us write $
! $
! Specific equations for $
! $
! The missing link between these two sets of equations is :
! $
!
!! How do you set down your calculations? !
! * The optical axis is the straight line that joins the center C of the lens to my eye, ! positively oriented in the direction of light propagation light for that observation, ! so from the cathedral to my eye. ! * First spherical refrating surface $DS1$ : $\overline{S_1C_1}=+5\:cm$, $n_{ini}=1$
! (air) and $n_{fin}=1.5$ (glass).! Second spherical refrating surface $
DS2$ : $\overline{S_1C_1}=-5\:cm$, $n_{ini}=1.5$
! (glass) and $n_{fin}=1$ (air)! Distance between $
DS1$ and $DS2$ vertices : $\overline{S_1S_2}=+10\:cm$! Object cathedral $
AB$ : $\overline{AB}=90\;m$ and $\overline{S_1A}=-400\;m$! Let us write $
\overline{A_1B_1}$ the intermediate image (the image of the cathedral given by $DS1$.
!
! * Specific equations for $DS1$ are :! $
\dfrac{1.5}{\overline{S_1A_1}}-\dfrac{1}{\overline{S_1A}}=\dfrac{0.5}{\overline{S_1C_1}}$ (équ. DS1a), and
! $\overline{M_T}=\dfrac{\overline{S_1A_1}}{1.5\cdot\overline{S_1A}}$ (équ. DS1b)! Specific equations for $
DS2$ are :! $
\dfrac{1}{\overline{S_2A'}}-\dfrac{1.5}{\overline{S_2A_1}}=-\dfrac{0.5}{\overline{S_2C_2}}$ (équ. DS2a), and
! $\overline{M_T}=\dfrac{1.5\cdot\overline{S_2A'}}{\overline{S_2A_1}}$ (équ. DS2b)! The missing link between these two sets of equations is :
! $
\overline{S_2A_1}=\overline{S_2S_1}+\overline{S_1A_1}=\overline{S_1A_1}-\overline{S_1S_2}$.
!
!
! - considering $
! $
! - considering $
! $
! $
!
!
!! Do you see some approximation that can be done ? !
! * In the visible range, refractive index values of transparent material are in the range [1 ; 2], ! then the focal lengthes of a spherical refractive surface (object as well as image) are ! expected to remain in the same order of magnitude than the radius of curvature, so a few ! centimeters in this case (we talk in absolute value here). ! ! * We can if we want just check this fact for $DS1$ ($|S_1C_1|=5\;cm$) using équation DS1 :! - considering $
\overline{S_1A_1}\longrightarrow\infty$ to obtain the object focal length
! $\overline{S_1F_1}$} we get :! $
-\dfrac{1}{\overline{S_1F_1}}=\dfrac{0.5}{\overline{S_1C_1}}$ $\Longrightarrow=\overline{S_1F_1}=-10\;cm$! - considering $
\overline{S_1A}\longrightarrow\infty$ to obtain the image focal length $\overline{S_1F'_1}$ we get :! $
\dfrac{1.5}{\overline{S_1F'_1}}=\dfrac{0.5}{\overline{S_1C_1}}\Longrightarrow\overline{S_1F'_1}=+15\;cm$
!
! * The distance of the cathedral from the lensball $|\overline{S_1A}|=90\;m$ is huge compared
! to the object focal length $|\overline{S_1F_1}|=10\;cm$, we can consider that the cathedral
! is at infinity from the lensball and so the image $\overline{A_1B_1}$ of the cathedral
! stands quasi in the image focal plane of $DS1$ : $\overline {S_1A_1}=\overline {S_1F'_1}=+15cm$.
! So we can directly use equation DS2a with :! $
\overline{S_2A_1}=\overline{S_2F'_1}=\overline{S_2S_1}+\overline{S_1F'_1}$
! $=\overline{S_1F'_1}-\overline{S_1S_2}=+15-10=+5\;cm$..
!
!
! $
! With more than 2 significant figures, your calculator would tell you $
! $
! $
! It is the product of the transverse magnifications of the cathedral introduced by the ! two spherical refracting surfaces of the lensball.
! $
! $
! So $
! $
! The image is $
! $
! The image is 1.7 cm height and it is reversed. !
!
!
!! Where is the image and how tall it is ? !
! * To perform calculation, you must choose a unic lenght unit in your calculation, ! here $cm$ or $m$. We choose $m$ below.
! * Equation DS1a gives :! $
\dfrac{1.5}{\overline{S_1A_1}}-\dfrac{1}{-400}=\dfrac{0.5}{0.05}$ $\Longrightarrow\overline{S_1A_1}=0.15\;m$! With more than 2 significant figures, your calculator would tell you $
0.150037$,
! which nearly exactly the value of $\overline{S_1F'_1}=+0.15\;m$, so the approximation
! $\overline{S_1A_1}=\overline{S_1F'_1}$ you could have done is fully justified.
!
! * Equation DS2a gives :! $
\dfrac{1}{\overline{S_2A'}}-\dfrac{1.5}{-0.1+0.15}=\dfrac{-0.5}{-0.05}$
! $\Longrightarrow\overline{S_2A'}=0.025\;m$
!
! * The final image is real, and stands 2.5 cm in front of the lensball in the side
! of your eye. Do not bring your eye or camera too close of the lensball !
!
! * The size of an image (transversally to the optical axis) is given by the transverse
! magnification $M_T$. By Definition $M_T$ is the ratio of the algebraic size of the
! final image $\overline{A'B'}$ to the algebraic size of the initial object $\overline{AB}$.
! With an intermediate image, it can be break down :! $
M_T=\dfrac{\overline{A'B'}}{\overline{AB}}$
! $=\dfrac{\overline{A'B'}}{\overline{A_1B_1}}\times\dfrac{A_1B_1}{\overline{AB}}$! It is the product of the transverse magnifications of the cathedral introduced by the ! two spherical refracting surfaces of the lensball.
! $
\overline{M_T}$ introduced by $DS1$ is
! $\overline{M_T}=\dfrac{\overline{S_1A_1}}{1.5\cdot\overline{S_1A}}$
! $=\dfrac{+0.15}{1.5\times(-400)}=-0.00025$! $
\overline{M_T}$ introduced by $DS2$ is
! $\overline{M_T}=\dfrac{1.5\cdot\overline{S_2A'}}{\overline{S_2A_1}}$
! $=\dfrac{1.5\cdot\overline{S_2A'}}{\overline{S_1A_1}-\overline{S_1S_2}}$ $=\dfrac{1.5\cdot0.025}{+0.15-0.10} =0.75$! So $
\overline{M_T}$ introduced by the lensball is :! $
\overline{M_T}=-0.00025\times0.75$ $=-0.00019\approx-1.9\cdot10^{-4}$! The image is $
\dfrac{1}{-1.9\cdot10^{-4}}\approx5300$ smaller than the cathedral.! $
M_T=\dfrac{\overline{A'B'}}{\overline{AB}}\approx8\cdot10^{-4}$
! $\Longrightarrow\overline{A'B'}=\overline{AB} \times M_T$ $=1.9\cdot10^{-4} \times 90\;m=-0.017\;m$! The image is 1.7 cm height and it is reversed. !
!
! $
! Taking into account that the image is reversed, the algebraic value of the apparent ! magnification is $
! $
! Cathedral of Orleans (France) !
! ! What is the apparent magnification of the cathedral ? !
! ! * "apparent magnification" = "angular magnification" = "magnifying power". ! ! * As calculated previously, standing 400 metres from the cathedral, the 90 m heigh ! cathedral sustends the apparent angles of $\alpha=arctan\left(\dfrac{90}{400}\right)=0.221\;rad=12.7°$
! at your eye.
!
! * The image of the cathedral is 1.7 cm heigth and is located between the lens
! (from its vertex $S2$) and your eyes and at 2.5cm from the lens. If your eye is 20cm
! away from the lens, so the distance eye-image is 17.5 cm (we use no algebraic values).
! Thus the image of the catedral subtends the apparent angle
! $\alpha'=arctan\left(\dfrac{1.7}{17.5}\right)=0.097\;rad=5.6°$ at your eye.
!
! * The apparent magnification $M_A$ of the cathedral throught the lensball for my
! eye in that position is! $
M_A=\dfrac{\alpha'}{\alpha}=\dfrac{0.097}{0.221}=0.44$.! Taking into account that the image is reversed, the algebraic value of the apparent ! magnification is $
\overline{M_A}=-0.44$.
!
! * You could obtained directly this algebraic value of $M_A$ by considering algebraic
! lengthes and angles values in the calculations :! $
\overline{M_A}=\dfrac{\overline{\alpha'}}{\overline{\alpha}}$
! $=\dfrac {arctan\left(\frac{-0.017}{-0.175}\right)} {arctan\left(\frac{90}{-400}\right)}$
! $=\dfrac{0.097}{-0.221}=-0.44$
!
! 
! Cathedral of Orleans (France) !
!! BEYOND : The gravitationnal lensball (or Einstein's ring), due to a black hole or a galaxy.
!! Similarities, and differences.
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! To see !!
!! still to be done, in progress. !!!!!! DIFFICULT POINT (contribute, or indicate a difficult point of understanding) !!!!
!! CULTURAL POINT (contributor) !!
!!! DO YOU MASTER ? !!!
!!!
!!! Describe the test !!!
!!! The text of the test (and its images, figures, audio, video, etc ...) !!! !!! Question text !!!
!!!
!!! !!! Answer choice 1 !!!
!!! Text if this answer 1 is chosen !!!
!!!
!!!
!!! -----
!!! !!! Answer choice 2 !!!
!!! Text if this answer 2 is chosen !!!
!!!